The Best Kisser Paradox

A story about a teenager and her driving instructor develops into an argument about whether intimacy can exist without another person’s participation.

increasingBearing stren­gth in each eventdecreasing

The Driving Lesson

The Driving Lesson A peculiar instructor The narrator recounts meeting Doug during a rainy driving lesson. He gives her a book, discusses experience, and treats the lesson as a conversation. A story inside the drive The memory seems to reveal an earlier encounter that the narrator has never shared. Its details later prove important to the novel’s questions about memory and invention.

The Candy Wrapper

The Candy Wrapper A translated poem Doug shares an unusual candy and reads its awkwardly translated wrapper. He treats the lines as a puzzle and a possible comfort against loneliness. Meaning in fragments The wrapper’s strange language invites interpretation rather than certainty. Its importance comes from the effort to make meaning from incomplete signs.

The Best Kisser Claim

The Best Kisser Claim A boast becomes a question The narrator says a young student claimed to be the world’s best kisser. Doug becomes troubled by what the claim would mean if kissing requires another person. Excellence requires relation The story turns a boast into a philosophical problem: a shared act cannot be judged by one participant alone. The exchange echoes the narrator’s desire for mutual recognition.

Jake’s Interpretation

Jake’s Interpretation An assumed ending The narrator tells Jake the driving lesson story, but he assumes she kissed Doug. His interpretation makes the anecdote more dramatic than the actual ending she later gives. A gap between tellings Jake’s assumption shows how a listener can reshape a story before its teller finishes. Their exchange enacts the novel’s suspicion that stories alter events.

The Actual Ending

The Actual Ending A different gesture The narrator finally reveals that she returned to show Doug the candy wrapper, not to kiss him. She read the second poem and ran back inside. Intimacy must be mutual Her correction restores the distinction between a kiss and a one-sided action. The story becomes a compact model of consent, connection, and interpretive error.

When the narrator is sixteen

During the rainy lesson

Later in the driving lesson

During the drive to the farm

After Jake’s interpretation